Tuesday, August 15, 2017
Granted, the threat of American fascism is considerably greater than any threat from Kim Jong-un. Historically, fascism has been one of the more disagreeable outgrowths of plutocracy — and our widening wealth gap, failure to enforce antitrust restrictions, and antidemocratic actions like the Citizens United decision all have broadened the powers of the megawealthy over the rest of us.
The fascist penchant for militarism has been characteristically American for at least a century, along with the propensity to demonize foreigners and scapegoat minorities. True fascism in the United States has been countervailed more by cultural and regional disunity than by democratic institutions, but the growth of information technologies has broken down those barriers. All that remains is a stubborn affection for civil liberties — and those are under systematic attack.
Next week, something new will happen: a venereal disease will be traced to avocados, or Tr*mp will declare war on the Moon. Will America forget the threat of fascism?
Wednesday, August 9, 2017
How do you deal with a leader who is unstable, immoral, and incompetent? For starters, you can do your best to keep him from being reelected in 2020. In the meanwhile, you can hope that the people around him won't let him do anything too stupid.
A nuclear deterrent works only if your adversaries know you have it; hence, the bomb and missile tests, and the pictures of Kim with that rocket-ready nuclear warhead. When American experts conceded that the threat was real, our own Dear Leader and National Id reacted predictably. Kim countered Tr*mp's dire warnings with a specific threat against the air base on Guam, demonstrating his superiority at the freak-em-out rhetoric game.
Having lived through decades of Mutually Assured Destruction, beginning with the times I hid from atom bombs under my elementary school desk, I find it hard to take the current situation all that seriously. Rex Tillerson has been downplaying Tr*mp's bellicose pronouncements for all he's worth, and I'd like to think that even if Tr*mp did have a psychotic break and ordered a preemptive attack, "his" generals would not comply. (You don't think they'd have given him the real nuclear suitcase, do you?)
Over the next couple of months, the world will settle down to a nuclear-armed North Korea, China will be ignoring the economic sanctions it approved last week, and the USofA will move on to its next crisis. We all can put our old classroom desks back in storage.
Thursday, August 3, 2017
Back in the early Seventies, I met a Venezuelan general named Felix at a bar overlooking the Orinoco River. Hearing I was from New York, he wondered if I knew his friend Nelson. Nelson? Sí. Nelson Rockefeller.
Now, Venezuela is falling back into militaristic authoritarianism, but this time without the domination of the USofA. The American news media are presenting a simplistic, Manichean model of a socialistic "dictator" versus a "democratic opposition." The situation is not nearly so simple.
President Nicolás Maduro is heir to the "Bolivarian Revolution" of Hugo Chávez, a program that nationalized Venezuela's oil fields and used the profits to better the lives of Venezuela's poor. The program was understandably popular, and worked fairly well until oil prices collapsed. Maduro's efforts to maintain benefits to satisfy his base voters made the inevitable economic disruption much worse that it would have been otherwise, multiplying government debt and stoking triple-digit inflation. There was no money to pay for imports of food, medicine, and other essentials.
As beleaguered leaders are wont to do, Maduro makes sure that whatever goods are available go to his security forces. Those forces, along with substantial numbers of poor Venezuelans still fiercely loyal to the memory of Chávez, have kept Maduro in power — but the Presidente has another important advantage: there is no unified opposition.
The two former mayors recently moved from house arrest to prison agree with each other on almost nothing. Another opposition "leader" is Venezuela's Attorney General, a pro-democracy Bolivarian who is a member of Maduro's political party. Then there are the business interests calling for libertarian free markets, allies of the multinational oil companies that want their oil fields back (including remnants of the failed US backed coup attempt of 2002), a vast splintering of student groups, and more.
Typical of such situations, the largest group consists of people who really don't care who is in charge so long as their families have access to food, clothing, shelter, and medical care.
The US sanctions against Maduro and his close associates will accomplish nothing: it appears that the Bolivarians, unlike most political leaders, failed to enrich themselves personally while in power. An embargo on Venezuelan oil would make the lives of ordinary Venezuelans much worse (and elevate gasoline prices in the US.) At this time, there's nothing to do but "wait and see."
Thursday, July 27, 2017
• Tweeting the purge of transgender personnel from the military was both bizarre and absolutely vile — but maybe it's supposed to make up for the impending martyrdom of Jeff Sessions.
• Tr*mp will never find an AG the equal of Jeff Sessions, given that Adolf Eichmann was executed in 1962.
• If the Democrats' "Better Deal" had included single-payer heath care, somebody might have paid attention.
• Popular protest in Poland prompted a veto of "judiciary reform" by Andrzej Duda, demonstrating that marches still can accomplish something, somewhere.
• Sadly, it seems that "somewhere" does not include Turkey.
• Anthony Scaramucci, Wow. Anthony Scaramucci.
• We knew that playing football caused brain damage — now we need data on watching football.
Tuesday, July 18, 2017
Jerry Moran? Who's Jerry Moran? It wouldn't be very surprising if even Kansans couldn't come up with the name of their Senator — but it was Moran, along with Mike Lee, Susan Collins, and Rand Paul who spared their fellow Republicans the jeopardy of voting on so-called "repeal and replace." Here's how the New York Times counted the votes:
The "no" group consists of the four named above plus the forty-eight Democrats. We can be sure that the "no" Republicans were personally selected by Mitch McConnell -- discipline is tight. Collins is the party's token moderate; Paul and Lee can claim ideological purity and avoid being "primaried" from the right; but what about Jerry Moran?
Moran gained some cover by "teaming up" with Lee in announcing his opposition, and it well could be that fellow Kansans Charles and David Koch (who bankroll primary challenges from the right) preapproved Moran's "defection." Be that as it may, somebody had to save those thirty-four "unclear" and "concerned" Republicans from the political damage they would have suffered by voting for an extraordinarily unpopular bill.
It's interesting that the three Republicans selected to prevent consideration of a straight repeal, with no replacement, were all women. As Republicans know, women are allowed to have "soft spots" — they can be forgiven a failure to be unfailingly "tough" on the poor.
Friday, July 14, 2017
The half of all Americans whose employers provide them with health insurance may be far too indifferent to Republican plans to demolish Medicaid. If they have parents, they should be paying more attention.
More than half the residents of nursing homes are supported by Medicaid, which assumes the costs after those residents have spent down their personal wealth. The average annual cost in the US is over $75,000 per year, so personal wealth tends to disappear quite rapidly. Not too far in the future, large numbers of baby boomers will need the level of care nursing homes provide. What will their children do if Medicaid isn't available?
Essentially, they have three choices:
• Cover the costs themselves. Ouch!
• Put mom in the spare bedroom, and tend to all her needs. Eeek!
• Euthanasia. (Don't get caught!)
When you put it that way, most people will understand why it's a good idea to get on the phone to their representatives in DC and raise a ruckus. Spread the word, and do it now!
Wednesday, July 12, 2017
Based on her activities in the US over the past several years, it looks like Veselnitskaya is employed by some of the Russian businessmen hurt by sanctions under the Magnitsky Act of 2012, the sanctions that inspired Putin to "retaliate" by stopping adoptions of Russian children by Americans. Pretty clearly, nobody in the Tr*mp campaign would have been interested in discussing the sanctions, so Veselnitskaya tried a bait-and-switch. The campaign would be interested in some good dirt on Hillary, even if it came from the Russian government.
Junior and his pals were interested — but they were disappointed.
As I've previously observed, Russia never needed any help from Tr*mp and Co. to interfere in the American election — but certainly had no qualms about compromising individuals who might become part of a future Tr*mp Administration. Given the high levels of both cupidity and incompetence on the Tr*mp team, the Russians didn't have to try too hard.
Just the same, those investigating Russian interference in the election are not going to get much mileage out of the new Confusions of Young Witless, Tr*mp's "high quality" son. We've already seen all the "there" that's "there."