Demonstrating his usual absence of anything resembling sensitivity, Mitt Romney kissed Binyamin Netanyahu's ass a couple of days ago, noting how Israeli "culture" must be superior to the Palestinian "culture next door" because the Israelis have more money. A lot of journalists and others have pointed out that it's hard to attain economic success while under occupation — but why belabor the obvious?
What I heard was the old stereotype of the "shrewd" Jewish businessman. Okay, that "shrewd" label, in the case of Jews, tends to include "cheap," "cutthroat," "greedy," "selfish," and "corrupt." Hey! No wonder Romney admires them so much! I wonder if anyone from AIPAC noticed.
Israelis and Palestinians, however, are not the only "neighbors" Romney cited with regard to one being economically superior to the other. Another comparison, of course, was the USofA v. Mexico; yet another was Chile v. Ecuador. For those accusing Romney of racism, those comparisons offer only more ammunition.
The USofA, as Sheriff Joe Arpaio clearly has observed, is a hell of a lot whiter than the predominantly mestizo Mexico. Chile, where the indigenous population was pretty much wiped out by the Conquistadores, had its "white" population greatly "enhanced" by emigrant Germans and Italians. Ecuador still is pretty much mestizo and Indio.
Nice examples, Mitt. As I recall, your quasi-Christian cult first allowed black members to be admitted to your priesthood way back in 1978, when you were in your early thirties. Given all of the above, it just might be reasonable to wonder if you might be a racist.
Whatever. Clearly, you want to attract many more big big bucks from Sheldon Adeldon — who accompanied you to Israel — and also from as many other right-wing corporatist Jews as you can suck into your bottomless maw. Most Jews, however — those who are not millionaires — remain pretty strong for Obama