Second guessing Our President on foreign policy seems to be the new national pastime, but none of the second-guessers seems to have an answer to the question, "Well, then what would you do?" I sure don't.
McCain and Graham like to dance around like Yosemite Sam and sing their "Get tough" song, but really — invade Iraq again? Go to war with Russia, perhaps? Sometimes the options come down to few or none.
Arm and train the "moderates" in Syria? First you'd have to find some, and you probably couldn't find enough to have any impact on the situation over there. Apart from the Kurds, the Iraqis are pretty much worthless when it comes to fighting ISIL, and Haider al-Abadi looks to me like Nuri al-Maliki lite. Okay, it would be very nice if the Kurds didn't have to rely on Soviet era weapons, but arming them with something better risks pissing off the Iranians and the Turks. (The Iranians and the Turks? No wonder Obama seems more than a little burnt out lately!)
How about arming and training the western Ukrainians? It yet may happen, but didn't we fight enough proxy wars against Russia last century? And think how successful those were!
As you know, I'm not a big fan of Barack Obama, but as far as foreign policy goes, I suggest he's muddling through as best he can — and no worse than anybody else could manage, under the circumstances. Let's all just take a step back, and let him muddle.