It's more than two years until the Iowa conventions, but the pundits, of course, have to say something. Chuck Schumer, the senator from Wall Street, also has weighed in, along with a bunch of Hollywood assholes on behalf of Hillary. Christie is not yet endorsed by any big shot Republican PACs, which demonstrates that big shot Republican PACs are not quite so dumb as Hollywood assholes, but the pundits don't much care.
We've already had another Clinton, a slightly darker complected "first Black president" by the name of Barack Obama. We certainly don't need another. This time around, we need a liberal.
Christie, on the other hand, is just another opportunist with a gigantic ego and a tendency to dissemble. I would like it, of course, if the Red States advanced Ted Cruz, but only if the Democrats had somebody who was a real Democrat to oppose him.
Yes, I dream of Elizabeth Warren, but that probably won't happen this time around. Too bad. Warren v. Cruz would offer voters a real choice — kind of like DeBlasio v. Lhota. Okay, I apologize. Lhota is not nearly so bad as Cruz. If he ran against Hillary, I just might vote for him.
Friday, November 8, 2013
Clinton v. Christie? Oh, crap!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment