Showing posts with label nationalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nationalism. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 4, 2017
Patriots
Judging by the explosions, there are a lot of patriots in my neighborhood.
Patriotism makes me nervous. It seems to require a wholesale suspension of judgement, and a memory of history riddled with more holes than a speed limit sign in rural Texas. It is not, as Dr. Johnson said, "the last refuge of a scoundrel." Rather, it is a well-worn tool from the tool kit of every scoundrel engaged in politics.
There are those who maintain that patriotism somehow is different from nationalism, but they fail to explain just how it is different. Interestingly, no matter how different the nation-states or ruling elites that use it, the forms and functions of patriotism remain remarkably consistent. Its imagery is militaristic, and so is its central demand: unquestioning allegiance to the State.
Patriotism is so closely related to and interwoven with religious fervor that the two often are indistinguishable. Every "just war" is jihad, every "fallen hero" a martyr. Ideology displaces rationality; symbolism justifies devastation.
(It's gone quiet out there. Is it still the American Century? I guess we'll have to wait and see.)
Friday, February 10, 2017
Turning Points
Reagan conspicuously inaugurated his presidential campaign in Philadelphia, Mississippi, where three civil rights workers had been murdered in 1964. He went on to slash taxes on the rich, decimate the labor movement, deregulate banking and industry, cripple environmental regulation, demean feminism, ignore the AIDS epidemic, shred the social safety net, double the military budget, finance third-world despots and their death squads, and preside over the glorification of greed. His "base" was virtually indistinguishable from Tr*mp's: working class whites threatened by socioeconomic change. Tr*mpian appeals to nationalism and the restoration of an imagined golden age — once known as "Morning in America" — inspire in this old man a powerful sense of déjà vu.
Reagan did immense damage; and one institution that suffered spectacularly was the Democratic Party. Democrats responded to America's rightward lurch by empowering the Democratic Leadership Council, so-called "centrists" who led the party's stampede to the right during the Clinton years. Only by comparison with Bill Clinton can Barack Obama be considered "progressive." Obama came to power surrounded by the same Robert Rubin acolytes who guided Clinton era economics, and his social policy echoed rather than led cultural change that already was underway. In the meanwhile, Republicans crippled Democratic power in Congress and in the States.
Right now, Democrats are confronting an existential choice: either continue the disastrous course of the Clintonian establishment, or line up behind populist progressives like Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, and Keith Ellison. The next Chair of the Democratic National Committee will be elected at the DNC's winter meeting, February 23–26. The leading candidates are the progressive wing's Keith Ellison and the establishment's Thomas Perez.
Only a genuinely progressive agenda can reclaim the support of the "Reagan Democrats" and revitalize the Democratic Party. I encourage serious activists to put aside their Sharpies and poster board long enough to make personal contact with Democratic leaders in their localities, and demand support for Ellison. "More of the same" no longer is a viable option.
Wednesday, February 25, 2015
More etc., etc.
Love of Country
I was trying to figure out whether or not I love the USofA. Well, probably not, unless you count as love the relationship of a long-married couple who shuffle along side by side primarily because splitting up would be more trouble than it's worth. In other words, I'm not about to "lay down my life" to "protect" some alleged "ideals" that may or may not have ever been put into practice. Anyway, the plutocracy is strong enough and rich enough to look after its own ass.
Four Months for Greece
Greeks will continue to suffer as long as Greece is stuck with austerity, and if Syriza is pushed aside by the Germans and their fellow travelers, "Europe" is likely to find itself dealing with Golden Dawn. Europe will be pulled, one way or the other, by Greece, and Europe has to decide whether it will be pulled to the left or the right.
Three British Girls
The three girls who recently lit out for the Islamic State were middle class, good students, and not especially religious until very recently. So why did they take off for the alleged caliphate? My guess is that they were made to feel more and more isolated and alienated from British society, and the IS was the only outlet they could find. The hatemongers, both in Europe and the USofA, are doing more to strengthen the enemy than to weaken it.
Net Neutrality
So far, so good. Back in the eighties and nineties, monopolistic telephone companies were forced to lease bandwidth to competitors, which led to steep declines in the prices of long-distance phone calls. If Comcast and the other internet giants are forced to lease bandwidth to smaller competitors, what might the impact be? Let's hope we get to find out.
Homeland Security
Maybe we should try getting along with a lot less of it for a while, and see if it makes a difference. To bad for the employees who will have to work without getting paid, but since those who work for the Department are not allowed to unionize, I guess they'll just have to eat it.
Labels:
caliphate,
FCC,
Greece,
homeland security,
ISIL,
ISIS,
Islamic State,
nationalism,
Syriza
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

